
After all, they are a business and a lot of their user base runs Windows. FL's priorities may not line up with mine. I just hope FL assigns the appropriate number of development resources to this project and makes it a priority. I know it may take FL some time to get there, and I understand why. But I am looking forward to a native Apple Silicon version of Logos. I think Logos will run OK on it under Rosetta in most cases. I ordered a 13-inch MacBook Pro, Apple M1 chip with 8-core CPU and 8-core GP and 16-core Neural Engine, 16GB unified memory, 1TB SSD storage.
LOGOS BIBLE APP FOR MAC PRO

I can't help but feel Mac users are a bit of a second-class citizen in the Logos ecosystem, but maybe this will work itself out one day. No offense to folks that love other platforms, but I personally feel Logos is superior in their efforts to provide their users with the very best Bible study platform. Logos was the most expensive and by far the slowest on Mac, with Accordance being the fastest, and Olive Tree being the most user-friendly, but I chose Logos because I get more out of the Logos platform.

LOGOS BIBLE APP FOR MAC FOR MAC
Perhaps it's because Logos is a Windows-first app and the third party development tools used by FL are not as flexible for Mac development? I have no idea.Īnyway, I tried several Bible software apps/solutions before committing to Logos. I'm way out of my level of competence here, but it seems that FL is in a much weaker starting position than many other software publishers who are easily making the move to optimized M1 apps.
